sterile mce cat Search Results


94
MedChemExpress g418 selective antibiotic
G418 Selective Antibiotic, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/G418+Selective+Antibiotic%2C+Sterile/pm42149942-250-39-45
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
g418 selective antibiotic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
MedChemExpress cisplatin
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose <t>cisplatin</t> (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Cisplatin, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Cisplatin/pmc12636911-358-0-3
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cisplatin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress vorinostat mce cat
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose <t>cisplatin</t> (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Vorinostat Mce Cat, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/G-418+disulfate/pm35716669-330-17-18
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vorinostat mce cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MedChemExpress paclitaxel
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 <t>mg/kg+paclitaxel</t> 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Paclitaxel, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Paclitaxel/pmc12636911-358-43-46
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
paclitaxel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress catalog number hy k1058 16
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 <t>mg/kg+paclitaxel</t> 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Catalog Number Hy K1058 16, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Antibiotic-Antifungal+(100+%C3%97)%2C+Sterile/pmc12222628-68-2-1
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
catalog number hy k1058 16 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
MedChemExpress y 27632
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 <t>mg/kg+paclitaxel</t> 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Y 27632, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Y-27632/pmc10966527-228-88-89
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
y 27632 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MedChemExpress sb202190
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 <t>mg/kg+paclitaxel</t> 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Sb202190, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/SB+202190/pm38229169-314-62-63
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sb202190 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress penicillin streptomycin
ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 <t>mg/kg+paclitaxel</t> 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .
Penicillin Streptomycin, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Penicillin-Streptomycin+(100%C3%97)%2C+sterile/pm41239323-124-42-43
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
penicillin streptomycin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MedChemExpress recombinant mouse igfbp2 rmigfbp2 protein
<t>IGFBP2</t> is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups
Recombinant Mouse Igfbp2 Rmigfbp2 Protein, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/IGFBP-2%2C+Mouse/pmc13203004-106-3-8
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse igfbp2 rmigfbp2 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress protein a g beads mce cat
<t>IGFBP2</t> is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups
Protein A G Beads Mce Cat, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/G-418/pm39758996-241-33-36
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein a g beads mce cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
MedChemExpress m n acetylcysteine
<t>IGFBP2</t> is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups
M N Acetylcysteine, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Acetylcysteine/pmc10966527-228-70-73
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m n acetylcysteine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress m nicotinamide
<t>IGFBP2</t> is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups
M Nicotinamide, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sterile+mce+cat/Nicotinamide/pmc10966527-224-71-73
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m nicotinamide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Oligoclonal tumor-specific CD8 T-cell revival and IRE1α/XBP1-GDF15-mediated immunosuppressive niches determine neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in cervical cancer

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-012630

Figure Lengend Snippet: ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .

Article Snippet: Cisplatin (1.5 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-17394), anti-PD-1 antibody (200 μg/mouse, MCE, cat No. HY- P99144 ), IgG isotype control (200 μg/mouse, MCE, cat No. HY-P990679) and the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-19707) were formulated in sterile saline, while paclitaxel (15 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-B0015) was prepared in a vehicle containing 1% DMSO, 4% PEG300, 0.5% Tween-80, and 94.5% saline.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Transformation Assay, Western Blot, Control, CCK-8 Assay, In Vivo, Injection, Expressing, Gene Expression, Transfection

ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Oligoclonal tumor-specific CD8 T-cell revival and IRE1α/XBP1-GDF15-mediated immunosuppressive niches determine neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in cervical cancer

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-012630

Figure Lengend Snippet: ER stress activation drives chemoresistance and immune evasion in cervical cancer. SiHa and ME180 cells were treated with low-dose cisplatin (1 µM), high-dose cisplatin (2 µM), low-dose oxaliplatin (2.5 µM) or high-dose oxaliplatin (5 µM) for 24 hours in 6-well plates, and alterations in ER stress-related genes or EP8 signature genes at the mRNA ( A ) or protein ( B ) level were further detected. ( A ) Heatmap visualization of miRNA levels in SiHa and ME180 cervical cancer cells treated with chemotherapy for 24 hours. The values represent log₂-transformed fold changes relative to untreated controls. The data were normalized to those of ACTB (mean±SEM, n=3). ( B ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in cells treated as described in ( A ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( C ) CCK-8 viability assays after 24 hours of drug exposure demonstrating synergistic chemosensitivity in ME180 cells treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin combined with the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 µM). ( D ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. ( E ) Endpoint volumes in TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=5) treated with vehicle, chemotherapy only (cisplatin 1.5 mg/kg+paclitaxel 15 mg/kg, weekly), combination therapy (chemotherapy+anti-PD-1 200 µg biweekly), or triple therapy (combination therapy+4μ8C 10 mg/kg biweekly). All regimens were injected intraperitoneally. ( F ) Tumor growth curves (mean±SEM) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Endpoint tumor volumes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( G ) Endpoint tumor weights (means±SEMs) of the tumors in the mice described in ( e ). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (n=5). P values are indicated in the figure. ( H ) Western blot showing dose-dependent upregulation of ER stress and EP8-associated secretory proteins in the tumors of the mice treated as described in ( D ). β-actin served as a loading control. ( I–J ) Boxplots showing the GSVA scores of the CD8, EP8 subset signatures ( I ) and myeloid subsets ( J ) in the TC-1 syngeneic mice (n=3). The boxplots display the median, upper quartile, and lower quartile. Statistical significance was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. ( L ) Heatmap displaying the expression profiles of ER stress signaling and EP8 signature genes. The samples are grouped in (n=3). Gene expression values were Z score normalized. ( K ) IGV snapshot illustrating the chromatin occupancy of XBP1 at the GDF15 locus. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CDDP, cisplatin; EP8, epithelial subcluster 8; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer; i.p., intraperitoneal; IRE1α, inositol‑requiring enzyme 1 alpha; ME180, human cervical cancer cell line; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PERK, protein kinase R-like ER kinase; SiHa, human cervical cancer cell line; TC-1, mouse lung epithelial cell line transfected with HPV‑16 E6/E7 oncogenes; .

Article Snippet: Cisplatin (1.5 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-17394), anti-PD-1 antibody (200 μg/mouse, MCE, cat No. HY- P99144 ), IgG isotype control (200 μg/mouse, MCE, cat No. HY-P990679) and the IRE1α inhibitor 4μ8C (10 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-19707) were formulated in sterile saline, while paclitaxel (15 mg/kg, MCE, cat No. HY-B0015) was prepared in a vehicle containing 1% DMSO, 4% PEG300, 0.5% Tween-80, and 94.5% saline.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Transformation Assay, Western Blot, Control, CCK-8 Assay, In Vivo, Injection, Expressing, Gene Expression, Transfection

IGFBP2 is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: IGFBP2 promotes immunosuppression by regulating macrophage PD-L1 expression in NEUROD1-high small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-08112-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: IGFBP2 is selectively up-regulated in SCLC-N subtype and associated with poor prognosis. ( A ) Single cell sequencing data show IGFBP2 is up-regulated in SCLC-N. ( B ) A scatter plot showing the correlation between the transcriptional levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in the GSE60052 dataset. ( C ) Comparison of IGFBP2 levels between the NEUROD1 high-expression group and the NEUROD1 low-expression group in the GSE60052 dataset. ( D - E ) The expression levels of IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 in tissue specimens of SCLC patients were detected by mIHC ( D ) and RT-qPCR ( E ), respectively. ( F - G ) The mRNA and protein expression levels of IGFBP2 in different subtypes of SCLC cell lines. “a” denotes comparison with H446, “b” with H82, and “c” with H524. ( H ) High IGFBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis. ( I ) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient survival based on IGFBP2 and NEUROD1 expression levels in four groups

Article Snippet: Experimental mice received recombinant mouse IGFBP2 (rmIGFBP2) protein (MCE, USA; Cat#HY- P74846 ) (50 μg/kg) via tail-vein injection; controls received an equal volume of sterile saline.

Techniques: Single Cell, Sequencing, Comparison, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR

SCLC-N-driven macrophage polarization is IGFBP2-dependent. ( A ) Bar plot showing the correlation between IGFBP2 expression and immune cell infiltration in SCLC, based on CIBERSORT analysis of the GSE60052 dataset. ( B - C ) Protein and transcript levels of CD163 and IGFBP2 in tumor tissues were examined by mIHC ( B ) and RT-qPCR ( C ), respectively. ( D - F ) M0-THP-1 cells were treated with rhIGFBP2, and the mRNA and protein levels of M2-TAM markers (CD163 and HLA) were assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting ( D - E ), while cytokine levels (IL-10 and IL-12) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA ( F ). ( G - L ) M0-THP-1 cells were co-cultured with the indicated SCLC cells with IGFBP2 knockdown (sgIGFBP2). The mRNA and protein levels of M2-TAM markers (CD163 and HLA) were assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blot ( G - J ), while cytokine levels (IL-10 and IL-12) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA ( K - L )

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: IGFBP2 promotes immunosuppression by regulating macrophage PD-L1 expression in NEUROD1-high small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-08112-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: SCLC-N-driven macrophage polarization is IGFBP2-dependent. ( A ) Bar plot showing the correlation between IGFBP2 expression and immune cell infiltration in SCLC, based on CIBERSORT analysis of the GSE60052 dataset. ( B - C ) Protein and transcript levels of CD163 and IGFBP2 in tumor tissues were examined by mIHC ( B ) and RT-qPCR ( C ), respectively. ( D - F ) M0-THP-1 cells were treated with rhIGFBP2, and the mRNA and protein levels of M2-TAM markers (CD163 and HLA) were assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting ( D - E ), while cytokine levels (IL-10 and IL-12) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA ( F ). ( G - L ) M0-THP-1 cells were co-cultured with the indicated SCLC cells with IGFBP2 knockdown (sgIGFBP2). The mRNA and protein levels of M2-TAM markers (CD163 and HLA) were assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blot ( G - J ), while cytokine levels (IL-10 and IL-12) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA ( K - L )

Article Snippet: Experimental mice received recombinant mouse IGFBP2 (rmIGFBP2) protein (MCE, USA; Cat#HY- P74846 ) (50 μg/kg) via tail-vein injection; controls received an equal volume of sterile saline.

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, Knockdown

IGFBP2 promotes the expression of PD-L1 in macrophages. ( A ) Correlation analysis showing the association between PD-L1 and FOXP3 transcriptional levels in SCLC tissues. ( B - E ) RT-qPCR and Western blotting were used to assess the impact of IGFBP2 on PD-L1 expression in M0-THP-1 and M0-Mc macrophages (Mc, macrophages derived from human peripheral blood monocytes). ( F - H ) RT-qPCR, Western blotting and IF assay were used to assess IGFBP protein accumulation in M0-PM (PM, mouse peritoneal macrophages). ( I - J ) RT-qPCR and Western blotting showed that the SCLC-N subtype elicited a markedly greater up-regulation of PD-L1 in macrophages than any other subtype

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: IGFBP2 promotes immunosuppression by regulating macrophage PD-L1 expression in NEUROD1-high small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-08112-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: IGFBP2 promotes the expression of PD-L1 in macrophages. ( A ) Correlation analysis showing the association between PD-L1 and FOXP3 transcriptional levels in SCLC tissues. ( B - E ) RT-qPCR and Western blotting were used to assess the impact of IGFBP2 on PD-L1 expression in M0-THP-1 and M0-Mc macrophages (Mc, macrophages derived from human peripheral blood monocytes). ( F - H ) RT-qPCR, Western blotting and IF assay were used to assess IGFBP protein accumulation in M0-PM (PM, mouse peritoneal macrophages). ( I - J ) RT-qPCR and Western blotting showed that the SCLC-N subtype elicited a markedly greater up-regulation of PD-L1 in macrophages than any other subtype

Article Snippet: Experimental mice received recombinant mouse IGFBP2 (rmIGFBP2) protein (MCE, USA; Cat#HY- P74846 ) (50 μg/kg) via tail-vein injection; controls received an equal volume of sterile saline.

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Derivative Assay

IGFBP2 modulates CD8 + T-cell function by promoting PD-L1 expression on macrophages. ( A ) Schematic of the co-culture system. ( B - F ) Flow cytometry confirmed that PD-L1 blockade can reverse the suppression of CD8 + T-cell infiltration caused by high IGFBP2 expression in SCLC cells. ( G ) Tumor size of mice in different treatment groups. ( H ) Growth curves of tumors from mice with different treatments

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: IGFBP2 promotes immunosuppression by regulating macrophage PD-L1 expression in NEUROD1-high small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-08112-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: IGFBP2 modulates CD8 + T-cell function by promoting PD-L1 expression on macrophages. ( A ) Schematic of the co-culture system. ( B - F ) Flow cytometry confirmed that PD-L1 blockade can reverse the suppression of CD8 + T-cell infiltration caused by high IGFBP2 expression in SCLC cells. ( G ) Tumor size of mice in different treatment groups. ( H ) Growth curves of tumors from mice with different treatments

Article Snippet: Experimental mice received recombinant mouse IGFBP2 (rmIGFBP2) protein (MCE, USA; Cat#HY- P74846 ) (50 μg/kg) via tail-vein injection; controls received an equal volume of sterile saline.

Techniques: Cell Function Assay, Expressing, Co-Culture Assay, Flow Cytometry

The mechanism of IGFBP2 regulating PD-L1 expression in macrophages. ( A ) Western blotting showed that IGFBP2 modulates PD-L1 in macrophages independently of the IGF axis and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. ( B - C ) NLS structure domain and cell localization diagram. ( D - E ) RT-qPCR analysis of IGFBP2 and PD-L1 expression in cells after transfection. ( F ) Western blot showing IGFBP2 and PD-L1 protein levels following transfection. ( G ) IF showing IGFBP2 and PD-L1 expression in M0-THP-1 cells after transfection

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: IGFBP2 promotes immunosuppression by regulating macrophage PD-L1 expression in NEUROD1-high small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-08112-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: The mechanism of IGFBP2 regulating PD-L1 expression in macrophages. ( A ) Western blotting showed that IGFBP2 modulates PD-L1 in macrophages independently of the IGF axis and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. ( B - C ) NLS structure domain and cell localization diagram. ( D - E ) RT-qPCR analysis of IGFBP2 and PD-L1 expression in cells after transfection. ( F ) Western blot showing IGFBP2 and PD-L1 protein levels following transfection. ( G ) IF showing IGFBP2 and PD-L1 expression in M0-THP-1 cells after transfection

Article Snippet: Experimental mice received recombinant mouse IGFBP2 (rmIGFBP2) protein (MCE, USA; Cat#HY- P74846 ) (50 μg/kg) via tail-vein injection; controls received an equal volume of sterile saline.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection